Scientific theory
1. How can we call a scientific theory good if it is capable of being proved wrong?
2. How can we decide when a rhetorical critic provides a reasonable interpretation?
3. All theories involve trade-offs; no theory can meet every standard of quality
equally well. Of the 12 criteria discussed, which two or three are most import–
ant to you? Which one is least important?
4. Do you think objective scholars have any room in their approach for intuition?
If so, how might that work? Do interpretive scholars have any space for sensing?
