How could we make sure that discretion is used appropriately in meeting agency goals?

Discuss the role of discretion in probation (or parole/ your choice). How could we make sure that discretion is used appropriately in meeting agency goals? In what ways are those on the extremes of both the enforcement, and also the treatment end of the spectrum, ill-suited for probation work? (Feel free to use “fake” names, such as “Joe Brick” and “Ed Burns.” In discussing these two extremes.) How, instead, do you think we should go about balancing these two somewhat opposing goals of enforcement and treatment to best serve the overall goal of crime prevention? Provide examples as appropriate.