Does the Justice Department effectively make the case that local anti- apartheid sanctions do not intrude on federal power over foreign affairs? What would be the perspective of a foreign governmental official on this question?

Is there a difference in the extent to which the federal government —
or other nations — should tolerate sister-city relationships as compared to
disinvestment of public pension funds or selective purchasing laws by
localities?
2. Does the Justice Department effectively make the case that local anti-
apartheid sanctions do not intrude on federal power over foreign affairs?
What would be the perspective of a foreign governmental official on this
question?
3. Does the type of human rights violations distinguish the South
African case from the Myanmar case in terms of the extent to which
subnational actors should be able to participate in the legal process?