After reading chapter 10, return to page 195-199 and reread Griswold and Rauma, Architects, Inc. v Aesculapius Corp.
Please answer the following questions:
1) Why did this relationship end in litigation?
2) What are the main issues confronting the court?
3) What is each party’s position?
4)How did the court rule and why?
5)What are the reasons or public policies underlying the court’s decision?
Next, read the case on page 204-209, Watson, Watson, Rutland / Architects, Inc. v Montgomery County Board of Education. The Watson case addresses the competing claims of contract disclaimer and client expectations.
What is the court’s message in this case? Discuss the takeaway?
Textbook Link http://library.lol/main/A272E9AAB5A42F55A478B5487E…
you have download the book
