Based on today's lecture, what would seek to incorporate into that national identity? Why do think this would be effective in stirring up feelings of unity and patriotism among your fellows?

Part 1:

As we have seen, nation-states seek to cultivate a sense of patriotism and ‘belonging’ among their citizens by constructing a cohesive national identity, based on shared elements of culture, ethnic-identity, language, territory, and historical experience.

In 1918, nationalist sentiments were not widespread in Central Asia. However, in the Soviet Union ethno-nationalism was encouraged (subject to certain constraints), leading to the creation of five Soviet Social Republics in Central Asia. And, after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, those SSRs became full-fledged nation states.

Suppose you were a reformer seeking to promote the development of Central Asian national identities in 1918 when the Russian Empire had collapsed and the future was uncertain. Based on today’s lecture, what would seek to incorporate into that national identity? Why do think this would be effective in stirring up feelings of unity and patriotism among your fellows?

Part 2:

Consider the many ways that we have discussed binaries and oppositions throughout this course, and in today’s lecture.

Pick any one of the three comparisons below and briefly reflect on it under the light of NEAR E 101 lectures, either today’s lecture, or anything from the rest of the course. Make at least one reference to the lectures that have been helpful to understand the distinctions.