TWO SEPARATE QUESTIONS. DOES NOT NEED AN INTRO. EACH QUESTION HAS ITS OWN SOURCES. TWO SOURCES PER QUESTION. THANK YOU.
PAGE 1
How should the information privacy rights of adolescents be assessed?
Are adolescents really that different from adults? Before parents all answer “yes,” consider what would happen if adolescent’s right to privacy was restricted.
How does the adolescent right to privacy balance with the right of parents to manage their adolescent’s behavior until they reach adulthood?
Is the right to privacy of adolescents in communicating with others any different from their communications with health care professionals?
PAGE 2:
Management and Law Issue: Is denying health care providers reimbursement for costs associated with an adverse medical event that was not preventable and did not result from negligence appropriate?
How could such denials have any bearing on improving patient safety?
Argue the point that providers should not be paid if there are adverse medical events.
This opens wide the possibility for insurers to deny payment for any and all negative outcomes in medicine, thereby possibly placing the financial burden on the patient if all does not go well. Since many medical cases do not have desirable outcomes despite the best efforts of all providers, could such a policy quickly de fund the entire medical system? Explain why or why not.
