Do you think it is a sound business practice? What potential benefits do you see of dual agency?

The definition of Dual Agency is the following:

“A broker who represents both the buyer and seller in a transaction.”

Applying what you have learned about agency, make the argument for or against the practice.

Please do an argument against:

Is it possible to fairly represent two competing parties to a transaction?

California allows the practice but many other states have laws against it.

Do you think it is a sound business practice?

What potential benefits do you see of dual agency?

What potential pitfalls would you anticipate?

Do you think you could be an effective dual agent? Why?